Pink Floyd have started legal action against their record label, EMI.
The legendary 'Wish You Were Here' rockers began proceedings over their entitlement to royalties from the record company, and how they are calculated today (09.03.10).
The band's lawyer, Robert Howe QC, said in court the group want to "know where they stand as a matter of contract,'' and that they are concerned about online sales of their tracks.
He questioned EMI's ''entitlement to sell individual tracks, or indeed any tracks, otherwise than in the original configuration of the Pink Floyd albums."
He further argued the band have a contractual clause which "expressly prohibits'' the selling of their tracks, either physically or online ''other than in their original configuration'' - in other words, the band's albums can only be sold as a whole body of work rather than as individual tracks.
Howe added: "Both parties were faced with a whole new world of potential exploitation," which has developed through changes in the way music is distributed since the group's last record contract was negotiated in 1999.
Howe also said EMI had argued the contractual agreement only applies to physical product and not online, which he argued "makes no commercial sense".
Pink Floyd - whose album 'Dark Side of the Moon' is one of the biggest selling of all time - signed with EMI in 1967 and are the label's second most successful artist after The Beatles, although they are presently defunct.
Struggling record company EMI reported in February it made a £1.5 billion pre-tax loss last year.
| Music Gear News |
RSS Feed
|
At Gear4Music.com we update our news channel daily to ensure you always get the latest and most important music news |
| Related Products |
Pink Floyd take EMI to court
Posted on 9th Mar 2010 16:30 to category Music News
|
|
Related Music News ▼
Recent Music News ▼
- News by Category:
- News by Date:
- » September 2010
- » August 2010
- » July 2010
- » June 2010
- » May 2010
- » April 2010
- » March 2010
- » February 2010
- » January 2010
- » December 2009
- » November 2009
- » October 2009
- » September 2009
- » August 2009
- » July 2009
- » June 2009
- » May 2009
- » April 2009
- » March 2009
- » February 2009
- » January 2009
Learn more about our editorial team











